0746 164 127 redactia@energy-center.ro
  • Actualitate
    • Consumatori
    • Furnizori
    • Legislatie mediu
    • Producatori
    • Stiri
  • Energie electrica
    • Energie nucleara
    • Energie regenerabila
    • Energie termica
    • Hidroenergie
  • Evenimente
  • Editorial
  • Exclusiv
  • Mediu, Tehnologie
  • Petrol, Gaze, Carbune
  • Utile
  • Video
  • English
  • Comunicate
STIRI RECENTE
Pe fondul cresterii consumului de energie, Nuclearelectrica a amanat oprirea Unitatii 1 de la Cernavoda
US-TDA si SN Nuclearelectrica SA in parteneriat pentru a sprijini acordarea de asistenta tehnologiilor nucleare mici si modulare
Unitatea 1 de la Cernavoda se opreste in mod controlat intre15 si 16 ianuarie
Ministrul Energiei: dupa liberalizarea pietei avem in centrul problemei clientul, nu furnizorul
Mintea de pe urma: ANRE a infiintat un call-center pentru schimbarea furnizorului de energie
Fuziunea celor trei distributii Electrica s-a incheiat prin aparitia unei noi companii: Distributie Energie Electrica Romania
De rasul curcilor, noua centrala de la Iernut s-a blocat tocmai cand era sa fie gata
Clientii Enel care sunt deja in piata libera de energie nu vor suporta o crestere a pretului
ENGIE Romania a achizitionat un parc fotovoltaic cu o capacitate de 9,3 MW
Fondul de Investitii in Energie Kazah-Roman, 10 statii si un nou concept in 2020

Gas Leaks in Fracking Disputed in Study

Posted On 18 septembrie 2013
By : Redactia
Comment: 0

By MICHAEL WINES / New York Times, September 16

Drilling for shale gas through hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, appears to cause smaller leaks of the greenhouse gas methane than the federal government had estimated, and considerably smaller than some critics of shale gas had feared, according to a peer-reviewed study released on Monday.
Related in Opinion

Workers tended to a well head in a hydraulic fracturing operation at Enana Oil and Gas well near Rifle, Colo., in March.
The study, conducted by the University of Texas and sponsored by the Environmental Defense Fund and nine petroleum companies, bolsters the contention by advocates of fracking — and some environmental groups as well — that shale gas is cleaner and better than coal, at least until more renewable-energy sources are developed. More than 500 wells were analyzed.

The Texas study concluded that while the total amount of escaped methane from shale-gas operations was substantial — more than one million tons annually — it was probably less than the Environmental Protection Agency estimated in 2011.

In particular, it indicated that containment measures captured 99 percent of methane that escaped from new wells being prepared for production, a process known as completion.

The Environmental Protection Agency has begun to require drillers to control leaks during completions, which are believed to be one of the major sources of methane losses at fracking wells. Although controls will not be required until January 2015, a number of companies already capture escaped gases at wells being prepared for production.

“Can we control it? Thanks to new E.P.A. regulations coming online, the answer to that is good news,” Eric Pooley, a senior vice president at the Environmental Defense Fund, said in an interview.

The report was published Monday in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. With the study, which ran from May through December of last year, the university was the first to conduct detailed examinations of individual drilling sites. It did so with the consent of petroleum companies, which provided about 90 percent of the financing for the study. Previous E.P.A. estimates relied on engineering calculations, and other studies gathered data via aircraft flights over drilling sites.

The study’s connection to the petroleum industry — among its sponsors and financiers are Shell, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Exxon Mobil and Chevron — may lead some to question its objectivity, some outside experts said. But most said the research and the reputations of the researchers appear solid.

“Previous studies that have gotten a lot of attention have had red flags jumping out all over them. This one didn’t,” said Michael A. Levi, the director of the program on energy security and climate change at the Council on Foreign Relations. In an e-mailed statement, Shell’s president, Marvin Odum, called the study “a prime example of key groups — that may not have the exact same interests — working collaboratively and taking a science-based approach” to the methane problem.

Mr. Odum said that collecting actual emissions data, rather than relying on estimates, would “ensure that both improvement efforts and regulatory changes can be focused on the areas that will have the biggest impact.”

The report comes at a time when shale-gas drilling is growing at a breakneck pace — production, now 30 percent of all United States natural gas, is expected to reach 50 percent by 2040 — but also when the industry is beset by controversy.

Citizen groups accuse drillers of despoiling streams and water supplies, and suppliers of wrecking local roads with parades of massive trucks. Environmental groups have split sharply over whether to support shale-gas development as a cleaner fuel that will suffice until wind and solar power assume a greater share of the nation’s energy supply.

The Texas study is the most comprehensive look to date at a contentious issue in the debate over fracking: the extent to which methane leaks during drilling and production offset the environmental benefits of the clean-burning natural gas the wells produce.

When burned as fuel, methane — the main component of natural gas — is comparatively clean, producing less carbon dioxide than coal and oil. But vented to the air, it is a short-lived but extremely potent greenhouse gas, trapping heat at a much higher rate than carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas.

Such potency means that even a small loss of methane to the air — just 3.4 percent, scientists say — can negate its climate-changing advantage over coal.

Some previous studies suggested that as much as 7.9 percent of all shale gas was lost to the atmosphere, a figure that included every stage of the gas process, from well to stove or furnace burner.

The Texas study did not examine potential losses outside the drilling pad. But its conclusion that losses at the well were comparatively low could remove one issue from the debate. The Environmental Defense Fund is leading other research efforts that should address losses elsewhere, including a look at methane leaks in municipal gas-distribution lines.

The American Petroleum Institute hailed the study’s conclusions, saying in a statement that its own efforts to reduce methane emissions “are paying off.” But while E.P.A.-mandated measures appear to have reduced emissions during well completions, the study also concluded that leaks elsewhere in the fracking process were higher than the E.P.A. had previously estimated.

Estimates of leaks from chemical pumps, while small, were twice past estimates, while leaks from pneumatic controllers, or valves, were pegged at more than 639,000 tons a year, roughly a third greater. None of those components are currently subject to federal regulation.

Articole pe aceeasi tema

  • Cum putem economisi energie si reduce factura la incalzire prin cateva metode simple?Cum putem economisi energie si reduce factura la incalzire prin cateva metode simple?
  • Exercitii de imaginatie: cum poate fi interpretat un contract comercial intre doua entitati din domeniul energiei ?Exercitii de imaginatie: cum poate fi interpretat un contract comercial intre doua entitati din domeniul energiei ?
  • Energia nucleara ramane o carte de jucat, mai ales pentru cei care nu au de alesEnergia nucleara ramane o carte de jucat, mai ales pentru cei care nu au de ales
  • <!--:ro-->ArcelorMittal Galati continua programul de investitii pentru cresterea eficientei energetice<!--:--><!--:en-->ArcelorMittal Galati continues energy efficiency investment programme<!--:-->ArcelorMittal Galati continua programul de investitii pentru cresterea eficientei energeticeArcelorMittal Galati continues energy efficiency investment programme
Despre autor
  • google-share
Previous Story

Danemarca majoreaza taxele pentru companiile petroliere care opereaza in Marea Nordului

Next Story

Exclusiv: Cum se administreaza o companie de stat care face jocul in piata?

Scrie un comentariu Anulează răspunsul

*
*

Acest sit folosește Akismet pentru a reduce spamul. Află cum sunt procesate datele comentariilor tale.

RECENT

POPULAR

COMMENTS

Test pentru SEN: cate zile poate rezista sistemul in conditii de ger? Avem capacitati in rezerva care sa poata compensa un deficit de energie?

Posted On 18 ianuarie 2021

Nici in Bloomberg sa nu mai crezi. Daca nu este naturala, cresterea pretului la gaze si energie trebuie sa fie artificiala si bazata pe fake news?

Posted On 17 ianuarie 2021

20 de probleme cu caloriferele si rezolvarea lor

Posted On 17 ianuarie 2021

Scurta radiografie a sistemului energetic romanesc. La ce sa ne asteptam in 2018 ? (partea I)

Posted On 7 ianuarie 2018

Exclusiv: ce minte diabolica a masluit OUG de modificare a Legii 220/2008 privind promovarea energiei verzi?

Posted On 12 iunie 2013

Exclusiv: ANRE moare de grija consumatorilor, dar are ca prioritate profiturile furnizorilor straini

Posted On 18 septembrie 2012

Va inselati. Dezechilibrele totale pe o...

Posted On 13 ianuarie 2021

Trecerea la decontarea la 15 minute este...

Posted On 13 ianuarie 2021

Pe-asta cu bananele recunosc ca n-am...

Posted On 14 decembrie 2020

Publicitate



PUBLICITATE dreapta

‹ ›

Arhiva

Utile

20 de probleme cu caloriferele si rezolvarea lor

O mana nu spala pe alta: ANRE isi pune cenusa-n cap si da posibilitatea consumatorilor de energie sa incheie contracte in piata libera pana la 31 martie

Dumitru Chisalita: Pretul gazelor pe bursa la jumatate, dar majoritatea romanilor platesc aceleasi facturi mari la gaze

Câți bani aruncăm pe fereastră pentru ca nu stim gestiona pierderile de energie?

Peste 90 % din consumatori nu stiu ca se liberalizeaza piata de energie electrica la 1 ianuarie 2021

Video

Alexandru Moldovan, Redactor sef Energy-Center: Datorez colegilor mei de presa multe din lucrurile pe care le stiu astazi

Interviurile Energy-Center: Viorel Tudose, Getica 95: Degeaba vii in piata cu sume mari de bani daca nu ai capitalul uman

Interviurile Energy-Center: Viorel Tudose, Getica 95: dupa liberalizarea pietei batalia pentru consumatorii casnici va fi foarte mare

Interviurile Energy-Center.ro - Viorel Tudose, Getica 95: "Din punctul de vedere al energiei produse,Romania este o tara verde" (partea a III-a)

Interviurile Energy-Center.ro – Viorel Tudose, Getica 95: „Etica nu mai exista in piata de energie. S-a ajuns chiar la un jihad in piata” (partea a II-a)

FORMULAR DE CONTACT

  1. Nume *
    * Te rugam sa iti scrii numele
  2. Email *
    * Te rugam sa scrii o adresa de email valida.
  3. Mesaj *
    * Te rugam sa scrii un mesaj

Categorii

  • Actualitate
  • Energie electrica
  • Evenimente
  • Exclusiv
  • Mediu, Tehnologie
  • Petrol, Gaze, Carbune
  • Resurse Media
  • Utile
  • Video

Cele mai citite articole

Scurta radiografie a sistemului energetic romanesc. La ce sa ne asteptam in 2018 ? (partea I)

17 Comments

Exclusiv: ce minte diabolica a masluit OUG de modificare a Legii 220/2008 privind promovarea energiei verzi?

13 Comments

Exclusiv: ANRE moare de grija consumatorilor, dar are ca prioritate profiturile furnizorilor straini

12 Comments
© Energy-Center.ro. Acest site este proprietatea Spot Pro Media SRL. Construit și întreținut de Alex Mieluș cu ajutorul Wordpress.